Chaim Lerner’s killing
Here There Is No WhyChaim Lerner’s killing is the fatal outcome of a struggle on his apartment balcony, where Michal pushes him away as he attacks her and he falls over the railing. For years, the circumstances remain hidden; when Michal finally recounts them to Judah Loeb, the story turns a presumed suicide into an accidental death during an act of self-defense. Its decisive ambiguity lies in a single suspended moment: Chaim reaches toward Michal, she hesitates, and then he is gone.
Background and Delayed Disclosure
Michal tells the story at Charlie’s grave, long after Chaim’s death. She had been forbidden to reveal what happened by Zehava Lerner, who was then an important political figure. Zehava’s prohibition extended to everyone, but especially Judah. Michal explains that she could not tell him while Zehava was alive; the account surfaces only after that constraint has ended. Her silence is therefore not an uncertainty about how Chaim died, but the result of a family secret she had been ordered to keep.
The disclosure unfolds in stages. Michal first recounts the confrontation and accepts Judah’s statement that she killed Chaim, adding that she acted in self-defense. Later, she confirms what Judah had suspected from the beginning: Chaim did not kill himself. She describes him as wholly committed to survival, with physical pain and nightmare memories serving as fuel for life. He would have continued living until his last organ failed. Her testimony changes the meaning of his death without making the event simple: the fall was caused by Michal’s resistance, but it was not a deliberate killing.
The Confrontation
On the day of the fall, Zehava was in her office taking a phone call. Michal waited on the living-room sofa and drank Golani wine. Chaim appeared unexpectedly, stood beside her knees without touching her, seized the bottle, and drank half of it. She smelled additional alcohol on his breath, perhaps gin, though she could not identify it with certainty.
Chaim said he needed to apologize. He acknowledged that he had behaved abominably and needed to stop, and pointed out that Michal was to become his daughter-in-law. He asked her to join him on the balcony so they could speak privately, promising that even his depravity had limits. Michal was exhausted by their cat-and-mouse game and accepted the invitation. She did not question why he chose a balcony rarely used by the family; she took his stated wish to apologize at face value.
As soon as Chaim closed the balcony door, he attacked her. He pulled her into an embrace, kissed her hard on the lips, and touched her breast. Michal blocked him and tried to shove him away. He grabbed her left hand to steady himself, twisting it and pulling it out of its socket. The pain was severe. She drove her right arm into his chest and pushed him backward. In an earlier telling, she recalls that he raised his hand to strike her and that she caught and twisted it before pushing him toward the railing. She had recognized the threat of another blow and reacted before it reached her face.
The Fall and Its Immediate Meaning
Chaim stumbled backward into the railing. For an instant, his back balanced on its top bar, and he and Michal looked directly at each other. He reached out to her. She hesitated for an excruciating moment; then he tipped over the rail, fell headfirst, and struck the ground with a thump. In her first account, Michal remembers no scream, only the strange word “Whoops,” as though Chaim had dropped a glass. The smallness of the sound sharply contrasts with the fatality of the fall.
Michal’s descriptions emphasize how quickly the struggle unfolded and how bodily it was: a raised hand, a twisted arm, pain, a shove, the railing. She recalls experiencing the impending blow in slow motion, a response she associates with battered wives. The railing and Chaim’s unsteady footing turn a defensive movement into an irreversible outcome. His bad knee and hip, mentioned in her earlier account, further mark the physical vulnerability involved in his loss of balance; the narrative does not present the fall as a planned execution.
Confession, Responsibility, and Reinterpretation
When Judah says that she killed Chaim, Michal agrees. Her voice trembles and shifts in pitch as she qualifies the admission: it was in self-defense. She stubs out her cigarette on the railing and maintains eye contact with Judah. The admission does not erase her agency in the fatal push, but neither does it equate that push with an intention to kill. Michal’s account holds both facts together: she caused Chaim to fall, and she was responding to his assault.
The later telling makes the cause of Chaim’s death more explicit and overturns the suicide explanation. Michal speaks calmly and clinically, as though describing an ordinary matter, even though she is recounting the accidental killing of her father-in-law, one of Israel’s great minds. Judah says that Chaim’s behavior shocks him but does not surprise him; Michal asks how he knew. Before continuing, she and Judah sit together at Charlie’s headstone. His belief that Chaim could not have chosen death is confirmed by Michal’s account of a man whose identity rested on surviving. The story ends not with the secret’s disclosure alone, but with Judah and Michal facing what that disclosure establishes: Chaim’s death resulted from violence he initiated, Michal’s attempt to stop him, and a brief hesitation neither can undo.


